A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials
- Authors
- R. F. Galbraith
- Journal
- Statistics in Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780070807 →Countries where authors are citing A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials
This map shows the geographic impact of A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials
This network shows the impact of A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials.
About A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials
This paper, published in 1988, received 540 indexed citations . Written by R. F. Galbraith covering the research area of Statistics and Probability and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (92 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (74 citations) and Epidemiology (71 citations). Published in Statistics in Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780070807.