Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis

1.8k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2010, received 1.8k indexed citations. Written by Sofia Dias, Nicky J. Welton, Deborah M Caldwell and A. E. Ades covering the research area of Surgery, Statistics and Probability and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (399 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (261 citations) and Epidemiology (252 citations). Published in Statistics in Medicine.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/sim.3767 →

Countries where authors are citing Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/sim.3767.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026