A critical appraisal of propensity‐score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003

973 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2007, received 973 indexed citations. Written by Peter C. Austin covering the research area of Statistics and Probability and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistics and Probability (257 citations), Economics and Econometrics (219 citations) and Surgery (191 citations). Published in Statistics in Medicine.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/sim.3150 →

Countries where authors are citing A critical appraisal of propensity‐score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A critical appraisal of propensity‐score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A critical appraisal of propensity‐score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A critical appraisal of propensity‐score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003 more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A critical appraisal of propensity‐score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A critical appraisal of propensity‐score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A critical appraisal of propensity‐score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/sim.3150.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026