Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons

904 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2002, received 904 indexed citations. Written by Thomas Lumley covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (261 citations), Statistics and Probability (193 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (130 citations). Published in Statistics in Medicine.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/sim.1201 →

Countries where authors are citing Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/sim.1201.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026