A survey on unsupervised outlier detection in high‐dimensional numerical data

503 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2012, received 503 indexed citations. Written by Arthur Zimek, Erich Schubert and Hans‐Peter Kriegel covering the research area of Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Artificial Intelligence and Statistics and Probability. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (377 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (139 citations) and Signal Processing (74 citations). Published in Statistical Analysis and Data Mining The ASA Data Science Journal.

Countries where authors are citing A survey on unsupervised outlier detection in high‐dimensional numerical data

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A survey on unsupervised outlier detection in high‐dimensional numerical data. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A survey on unsupervised outlier detection in high‐dimensional numerical data with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A survey on unsupervised outlier detection in high‐dimensional numerical data more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A survey on unsupervised outlier detection in high‐dimensional numerical data

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A survey on unsupervised outlier detection in high‐dimensional numerical data. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A survey on unsupervised outlier detection in high‐dimensional numerical data.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/sam.11161.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026