Liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra): A phytochemical and pharmacological review

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 508 indexed citations. Written by Laura Cornara, Sónia Soares, Francisca Rodrigues and M. Beatriz P.P. Oliveira covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pharmacology (391 citations), Molecular Biology (204 citations) and Plant Science (104 citations). Published in Phytotherapy Research.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/ptr.6178 →

Countries where authors are citing Liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra): A phytochemical and pharmacological review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra): A phytochemical and pharmacological review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra): A phytochemical and pharmacological review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra): A phytochemical and pharmacological review more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra): A phytochemical and pharmacological review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra): A phytochemical and pharmacological review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra): A phytochemical and pharmacological review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/ptr.6178.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026