Review: Endophytic microbes and their potential applications in crop management

288 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2019, received 288 indexed citations. Written by James F. White, Kathryn L. Kingsley, Qiuwei Zhang, Rajan Verma, Matthew T. Elmore, Satish Verma, Surendra K. Gond and Kurt P. Kowalski covering the research area of Plant Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (223 citations), Cell Biology (78 citations) and Molecular Biology (61 citations). Published in Pest Management Science.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/ps.5527 →

Countries where authors are citing Review: Endophytic microbes and their potential applications in crop management

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Review: Endophytic microbes and their potential applications in crop management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Review: Endophytic microbes and their potential applications in crop management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review: Endophytic microbes and their potential applications in crop management more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Review: Endophytic microbes and their potential applications in crop management

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Review: Endophytic microbes and their potential applications in crop management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Review: Endophytic microbes and their potential applications in crop management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/ps.5527.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026