The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: Development of a software pipeline

Abstract

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 2.6k indexed citations. Written by Wim Vranken, Wayne Boucher, Tim J. Stevens, Rasmus H. Fogh, Anne Pajon, Miguel Llinás, Eldon L. Ulrich, John L. Markley, John Ionides and Ernest D. Laue covering the research area of Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (2.0k citations), Materials Chemistry (386 citations) and Cell Biology (269 citations). Published in Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/prot.20449 →

Countries where authors are citing The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: Development of a software pipeline

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: Development of a software pipeline. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: Development of a software pipeline with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: Development of a software pipeline more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: Development of a software pipeline

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: Development of a software pipeline. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: Development of a software pipeline.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/prot.20449.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper An Abundant Class of Tiny RNAs with Probable Regulatory Roles in Caenorhabditis elegans Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Measuring and Testing the Impact of News on Volatility Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Reactive oxygen species in cancer Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide)