What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models?

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 781 indexed citations. Written by Claudia Schütz and A. Warshel covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (611 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (187 citations) and Materials Chemistry (149 citations). Published in Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics.

Countries where authors are citing What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models?

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models? more than expected).

Fields of papers citing What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models?

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models?.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/prot.1106.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026