Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 918 indexed citations. Written by Inbal Halperin, Buyong Ma, Haim J. Wolfson and Ruth Nussinov covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry and Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (741 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (477 citations) and Materials Chemistry (237 citations). Published in Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics.

Countries where authors are citing Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/prot.10115.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026