BepiPred ‐3.0: Improved B‐cell epitope prediction using protein language models

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 119 indexed citations. Written by Magnus Haraldson Høie, Bjoern Peters, Morten Nielsen and Paolo Marcatili covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (92 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (42 citations) and Immunology (26 citations). Published in Protein Science.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/pro.4497 →

Countries where authors are citing BepiPred ‐3.0: Improved B‐cell epitope prediction using protein language models

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of BepiPred ‐3.0: Improved B‐cell epitope prediction using protein language models. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by BepiPred ‐3.0: Improved B‐cell epitope prediction using protein language models with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BepiPred ‐3.0: Improved B‐cell epitope prediction using protein language models more than expected).

Fields of papers citing BepiPred ‐3.0: Improved B‐cell epitope prediction using protein language models

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of BepiPred ‐3.0: Improved B‐cell epitope prediction using protein language models. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the BepiPred ‐3.0: Improved B‐cell epitope prediction using protein language models.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/pro.4497.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026