ACADO toolkit—An open‐source framework for automatic control and dynamic optimization
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/oca.939 →Countries where authors are citing ACADO toolkit—An open‐source framework for automatic control and dynamic optimization
This map shows the geographic impact of ACADO toolkit—An open‐source framework for automatic control and dynamic optimization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by ACADO toolkit—An open‐source framework for automatic control and dynamic optimization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACADO toolkit—An open‐source framework for automatic control and dynamic optimization more than expected).
Fields of papers citing ACADO toolkit—An open‐source framework for automatic control and dynamic optimization
This network shows the impact of ACADO toolkit—An open‐source framework for automatic control and dynamic optimization. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the ACADO toolkit—An open‐source framework for automatic control and dynamic optimization.
About ACADO toolkit—An open‐source framework for automatic control and dynamic optimization
This paper, published in 2010, received 733 indexed citations . Written by Boris Houska, Hans Joachim Ferreau and Moritz Diehl covering the research area of Control and Systems Engineering and Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Control and Systems Engineering (499 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (171 citations) and Automotive Engineering (140 citations). Published in Optimal Control Applications and Methods.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/oca.939.