The Impact of COVID‐19 Stay‐At‐Home Orders on Health Behaviors in Adults

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 295 indexed citations. Written by Emily W. Flanagan, Robbie A. Beyl, S. Nicole Fearnbach, Abby D. Altazan, Corby K. Martin and Leanne M. Redman covering the research area of Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (157 citations), Economics and Econometrics (62 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (61 citations). Published in Obesity.

Countries where authors are citing The Impact of COVID‐19 Stay‐At‐Home Orders on Health Behaviors in Adults

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Impact of COVID‐19 Stay‐At‐Home Orders on Health Behaviors in Adults. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Impact of COVID‐19 Stay‐At‐Home Orders on Health Behaviors in Adults with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Impact of COVID‐19 Stay‐At‐Home Orders on Health Behaviors in Adults more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Impact of COVID‐19 Stay‐At‐Home Orders on Health Behaviors in Adults

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Impact of COVID‐19 Stay‐At‐Home Orders on Health Behaviors in Adults. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Impact of COVID‐19 Stay‐At‐Home Orders on Health Behaviors in Adults.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/oby.23066.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026