Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors

534 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2003, received 534 indexed citations. Written by Jinyuan Zhou, Bachchu Lal, David A. Wilson, John Laterra and Peter C.M. van Zijl covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Biophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (495 citations), Materials Chemistry (447 citations) and Biophysics (179 citations). Published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Countries where authors are citing Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10651.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026