Considering context, place and culture: the National Latino and Asian American Study

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 529 indexed citations. Written by Margarita Alegrı́a, David T. Takeuchi, Glorisa Canino, Naihua Duan, Patrick E. Shrout, Xiao‐Li Meng, William A. Vega, Nolan Zane, Doryliz Vila and Meghan Woo covering the research area of Health and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (329 citations), Sociology and Political Science (265 citations) and Social Psychology (186 citations). Published in International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/mpr.178 →

Countries where authors are citing Considering context, place and culture: the National Latino and Asian American Study

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Considering context, place and culture: the National Latino and Asian American Study. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Considering context, place and culture: the National Latino and Asian American Study with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Considering context, place and culture: the National Latino and Asian American Study more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Considering context, place and culture: the National Latino and Asian American Study

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Considering context, place and culture: the National Latino and Asian American Study. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Considering context, place and culture: the National Latino and Asian American Study.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/mpr.178.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026