World drought frequency, duration, and severity for 1951-2010

592 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2013, received 592 indexed citations. Written by Jonathan Spinoni, Gustavo Naumann, Hugo Carrão, Paulo Barbosa and J. Vogt covering the research area of Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (498 citations), Water Science and Technology (154 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (151 citations). Published in International Journal of Climatology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/joc.3875 →

Countries where authors are citing World drought frequency, duration, and severity for 1951-2010

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of World drought frequency, duration, and severity for 1951-2010. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by World drought frequency, duration, and severity for 1951-2010 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites World drought frequency, duration, and severity for 1951-2010 more than expected).

Fields of papers citing World drought frequency, duration, and severity for 1951-2010

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of World drought frequency, duration, and severity for 1951-2010. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the World drought frequency, duration, and severity for 1951-2010.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/joc.3875.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026