Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social bots

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 255 indexed citations. Written by Kai‐Cheng Yang, Onur Varol, Clayton A. Davis, Emilio Ferrara, Alessandro Flammini and Filippo Menczer covering the research area of Signal Processing, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (182 citations), Information Systems (145 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (89 citations). Published in Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.115 →

Countries where authors are citing Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social bots

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social bots. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social bots with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social bots more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social bots

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social bots. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social bots.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.115.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026