Impacts of land use, population, and climate change on global food security

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 326 indexed citations. Written by Amy Molotoks, Pete Smith and Terence P. Dawson covering the research area of General Health Professions, Ecology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (109 citations), Global and Planetary Change (54 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (51 citations). Published in Food and Energy Security.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/fes3.261 →

Countries where authors are citing Impacts of land use, population, and climate change on global food security

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Impacts of land use, population, and climate change on global food security. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Impacts of land use, population, and climate change on global food security with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Impacts of land use, population, and climate change on global food security more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Impacts of land use, population, and climate change on global food security

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Impacts of land use, population, and climate change on global food security. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Impacts of land use, population, and climate change on global food security.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/fes3.261.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026