Global proliferation of small hydropower plants – science and policy
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/fee.1746 →Countries where authors are citing Global proliferation of small hydropower plants – science and policy
This map shows the geographic impact of Global proliferation of small hydropower plants – science and policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Global proliferation of small hydropower plants – science and policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global proliferation of small hydropower plants – science and policy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Global proliferation of small hydropower plants – science and policy
This network shows the impact of Global proliferation of small hydropower plants – science and policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Global proliferation of small hydropower plants – science and policy.
About Global proliferation of small hydropower plants – science and policy
This paper, published in 2018, received 283 indexed citations . Written by Thiago B. A. Couto and Julian D. Olden covering the research area of Water Science and Technology, Ocean Engineering and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nature and Landscape Conservation (167 citations), Ecology (112 citations) and Water Science and Technology (85 citations). Published in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/fee.1746.