Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/eqe.495 →Countries where authors are citing Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration
This map shows the geographic impact of Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration
This network shows the impact of Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration.
About Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration
This paper, published in 2005, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Luis Ibarra, Ricardo A. Medina and Helmut Krawinkler covering the research area of Building and Construction and Civil and Structural Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Civil and Structural Engineering (1.2k citations), Building and Construction (487 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (74 citations). Published in Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/eqe.495.