Citizen participation in the governance of nature‐based solutions

157 indexed citations
published 2022

Countries where authors are citing Citizen participation in the governance of nature‐based solutions

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Citizen participation in the governance of nature‐based solutions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Citizen participation in the governance of nature‐based solutions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Citizen participation in the governance of nature‐based solutions more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Citizen participation in the governance of nature‐based solutions

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Citizen participation in the governance of nature‐based solutions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Citizen participation in the governance of nature‐based solutions.

About Citizen participation in the governance of nature‐based solutions

This paper, published in 2022, received 157 indexed citations . Written by Bernadett Kiss, Filka Sekulova, Kathrin Hörschelmann, Carl Salk and Christine Wamsler covering the research area of Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (60 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (35 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (30 citations). Published in Environmental Policy and Governance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/eet.1987.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026