Grassland management impacts on soil carbon stocks: a new synthesis
- Journal
- Ecological Applications
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/eap.1473 →Countries where authors are citing Grassland management impacts on soil carbon stocks: a new synthesis
This map shows the geographic impact of Grassland management impacts on soil carbon stocks: a new synthesis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grassland management impacts on soil carbon stocks: a new synthesis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grassland management impacts on soil carbon stocks: a new synthesis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Grassland management impacts on soil carbon stocks: a new synthesis
This network shows the impact of Grassland management impacts on soil carbon stocks: a new synthesis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Grassland management impacts on soil carbon stocks: a new synthesis.
About Grassland management impacts on soil carbon stocks: a new synthesis
This paper, published in 2016, received 450 indexed citations . Written by Richard T. Conant, Carlos Eduardo Pellegrino Cerri, Brooke B. Osborne and Keith Paustian covering the research area of Soil Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Agronomy and Crop Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Soil Science (297 citations), Ecology (204 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (92 citations). Published in Ecological Applications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/eap.1473.