Clinician-administered PTSD scale: A review of the first ten years of research

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 1.6k indexed citations. Written by Frank W. Weathers, Terence M. Keane and Jonathan Davidson covering the research area of Epidemiology and Clinical Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (1.4k citations), Epidemiology (358 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (184 citations). Published in Depression and Anxiety.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/da.1029 →

Countries where authors are citing Clinician-administered PTSD scale: A review of the first ten years of research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clinician-administered PTSD scale: A review of the first ten years of research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clinician-administered PTSD scale: A review of the first ten years of research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinician-administered PTSD scale: A review of the first ten years of research more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Clinician-administered PTSD scale: A review of the first ten years of research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Clinician-administered PTSD scale: A review of the first ten years of research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Clinician-administered PTSD scale: A review of the first ten years of research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/da.1029.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026