Quest for Green‐Solvent Design: From Hydrophilic to Hydrophobic (Deep) Eutectic Solvents
- Journal
- ChemSusChem
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201900147 →Countries where authors are citing Quest for Green‐Solvent Design: From Hydrophilic to Hydrophobic (Deep) Eutectic Solvents
This map shows the geographic impact of Quest for Green‐Solvent Design: From Hydrophilic to Hydrophobic (Deep) Eutectic Solvents. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Quest for Green‐Solvent Design: From Hydrophilic to Hydrophobic (Deep) Eutectic Solvents with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quest for Green‐Solvent Design: From Hydrophilic to Hydrophobic (Deep) Eutectic Solvents more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Quest for Green‐Solvent Design: From Hydrophilic to Hydrophobic (Deep) Eutectic Solvents
This network shows the impact of Quest for Green‐Solvent Design: From Hydrophilic to Hydrophobic (Deep) Eutectic Solvents. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Quest for Green‐Solvent Design: From Hydrophilic to Hydrophobic (Deep) Eutectic Solvents.
About Quest for Green‐Solvent Design: From Hydrophilic to Hydrophobic (Deep) Eutectic Solvents
This paper, published in 2019, received 402 indexed citations . Written by Catarina Florindo, Luı́s C. Branco and Isabel M. Marrucho covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Environmental Chemistry and Catalysis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Catalysis (309 citations), Filtration and Separation (101 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (92 citations). Published in ChemSusChem.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201900147.