Vanadium Electrolyte Studies for the Vanadium Redox Battery—A Review

427 indexed citations
published 2016

Countries where authors are citing Vanadium Electrolyte Studies for the Vanadium Redox Battery—A Review

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vanadium Electrolyte Studies for the Vanadium Redox Battery—A Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vanadium Electrolyte Studies for the Vanadium Redox Battery—A Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vanadium Electrolyte Studies for the Vanadium Redox Battery—A Review more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Vanadium Electrolyte Studies for the Vanadium Redox Battery—A Review

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Vanadium Electrolyte Studies for the Vanadium Redox Battery—A Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Vanadium Electrolyte Studies for the Vanadium Redox Battery—A Review.

About Vanadium Electrolyte Studies for the Vanadium Redox Battery—A Review

This paper, published in 2016, received 427 indexed citations . Written by Maria Skyllas‐Kazacos, Liuyue Cao and Asem Mousa covering the research area of Automotive Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (385 citations), Automotive Engineering (203 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (142 citations). Published in ChemSusChem.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201600102.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026