Safer Electrolytes for Lithium‐Ion Batteries: State of the Art and Perspectives

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 745 indexed citations. Written by Julian Kalhoff, Gebrekidan Gebresilassie Eshetu, Dominic Bresser and Stefano Passerini covering the research area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (689 citations), Automotive Engineering (360 citations) and Catalysis (96 citations). Published in ChemSusChem.

Countries where authors are citing Safer Electrolytes for Lithium‐Ion Batteries: State of the Art and Perspectives

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Safer Electrolytes for Lithium‐Ion Batteries: State of the Art and Perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Safer Electrolytes for Lithium‐Ion Batteries: State of the Art and Perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Safer Electrolytes for Lithium‐Ion Batteries: State of the Art and Perspectives more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Safer Electrolytes for Lithium‐Ion Batteries: State of the Art and Perspectives

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Safer Electrolytes for Lithium‐Ion Batteries: State of the Art and Perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Safer Electrolytes for Lithium‐Ion Batteries: State of the Art and Perspectives.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201500284.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026