Novel Process Windows for Enabling, Accelerating, and Uplifting Flow Chemistry
- Journal
- ChemSusChem
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201200766 →Countries where authors are citing Novel Process Windows for Enabling, Accelerating, and Uplifting Flow Chemistry
This map shows the geographic impact of Novel Process Windows for Enabling, Accelerating, and Uplifting Flow Chemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Novel Process Windows for Enabling, Accelerating, and Uplifting Flow Chemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Novel Process Windows for Enabling, Accelerating, and Uplifting Flow Chemistry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Novel Process Windows for Enabling, Accelerating, and Uplifting Flow Chemistry
This network shows the impact of Novel Process Windows for Enabling, Accelerating, and Uplifting Flow Chemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Novel Process Windows for Enabling, Accelerating, and Uplifting Flow Chemistry.
About Novel Process Windows for Enabling, Accelerating, and Uplifting Flow Chemistry
This paper, published in 2013, received 504 indexed citations . Written by Volker Hessel, Dana Kralisch, Norbert Kockmann, Timothy Noël and Qi Wang covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (429 citations), Organic Chemistry (192 citations) and Molecular Biology (85 citations). Published in ChemSusChem.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201200766.