Non‐Haloaluminate Room‐Temperature Ionic Liquids in Electrochemistry—A Review
- Journal
- ChemPhysChem
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200301017 →Countries where authors are citing Non‐Haloaluminate Room‐Temperature Ionic Liquids in Electrochemistry—A Review
This map shows the geographic impact of Non‐Haloaluminate Room‐Temperature Ionic Liquids in Electrochemistry—A Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Non‐Haloaluminate Room‐Temperature Ionic Liquids in Electrochemistry—A Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Non‐Haloaluminate Room‐Temperature Ionic Liquids in Electrochemistry—A Review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Non‐Haloaluminate Room‐Temperature Ionic Liquids in Electrochemistry—A Review
This network shows the impact of Non‐Haloaluminate Room‐Temperature Ionic Liquids in Electrochemistry—A Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Non‐Haloaluminate Room‐Temperature Ionic Liquids in Electrochemistry—A Review.
About Non‐Haloaluminate Room‐Temperature Ionic Liquids in Electrochemistry—A Review
This paper, published in 2004, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Marisa C. Buzzeo, Russell G. Evans and Richard G. Compton covering the research area of Electrochemistry, Polymers and Plastics and Catalysis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Catalysis (821 citations), Electrochemistry (536 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (368 citations). Published in ChemPhysChem.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200301017.