SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 577 indexed citations. Written by David A. Baran, Cindy L. Grines, Steven R. Bailey, Daniel Burkhoff, Shelley Hall, Timothy D. Henry, Steven M. Hollenberg, Navin K. Kapur, William W. O’Neill and Joseph P. Ornato covering the research area of Surgery, Biomedical Engineering and Emergency Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (478 citations), Emergency Medicine (390 citations) and Surgery (376 citations). Published in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions.

Countries where authors are citing SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28329.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026