Objective assessment of technical surgical skills
Countries where authors are citing Objective assessment of technical surgical skills
This map shows the geographic impact of Objective assessment of technical surgical skills. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Objective assessment of technical surgical skills with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Objective assessment of technical surgical skills more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Objective assessment of technical surgical skills
This network shows the impact of Objective assessment of technical surgical skills. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Objective assessment of technical surgical skills.
About Objective assessment of technical surgical skills
This paper, published in 2010, received 396 indexed citations . Written by P. Diederick van Hove, Gabriëlle J. M. Tuijthof, E. G. G. Verdaasdonk, Laurents P. S. Stassen and Jenny Dankelman covering the research area of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (367 citations), Biomedical Engineering (167 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (133 citations). Published in British journal of surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7115.