Characterization and analysis of the molecular weight of lignin for biorefining studies
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1500 →Countries where authors are citing Characterization and analysis of the molecular weight of lignin for biorefining studies
This map shows the geographic impact of Characterization and analysis of the molecular weight of lignin for biorefining studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Characterization and analysis of the molecular weight of lignin for biorefining studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Characterization and analysis of the molecular weight of lignin for biorefining studies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Characterization and analysis of the molecular weight of lignin for biorefining studies
This network shows the impact of Characterization and analysis of the molecular weight of lignin for biorefining studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Characterization and analysis of the molecular weight of lignin for biorefining studies.
About Characterization and analysis of the molecular weight of lignin for biorefining studies
This paper, published in 2014, received 374 indexed citations . Written by Allison K. Tolbert, Hannah Akinosho, Amit K. Naskar and Arthur J. Ragauskas covering the research area of Plant Science and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (345 citations), Plant Science (113 citations) and Biotechnology (75 citations). Published in Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1500.