Wound dressings: Current advances and future directions
Countries where authors are citing Wound dressings: Current advances and future directions
This map shows the geographic impact of Wound dressings: Current advances and future directions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wound dressings: Current advances and future directions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wound dressings: Current advances and future directions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Wound dressings: Current advances and future directions
This network shows the impact of Wound dressings: Current advances and future directions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Wound dressings: Current advances and future directions.
About Wound dressings: Current advances and future directions
This paper, published in 2019, received 659 indexed citations . Written by Erfan Rezvani Ghomi, Shahla Khalili, Saied Nouri Khorasani, Rasoul Esmaeely Neisiany and Seeram Ramakrishna covering the research area of Rehabilitation and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Rehabilitation (480 citations), Biomaterials (424 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (126 citations). Published in Journal of Applied Polymer Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/app.47738.