Opportunities of Covalent Organic Frameworks for Advanced Applications

517 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2018, received 517 indexed citations. Written by Yanpei Song, Qi Sun, Briana Aguila and Shengqian Ma covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (474 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (372 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (193 citations). Published in Advanced Science.

Countries where authors are citing Opportunities of Covalent Organic Frameworks for Advanced Applications

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Opportunities of Covalent Organic Frameworks for Advanced Applications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Opportunities of Covalent Organic Frameworks for Advanced Applications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Opportunities of Covalent Organic Frameworks for Advanced Applications more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Opportunities of Covalent Organic Frameworks for Advanced Applications

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Opportunities of Covalent Organic Frameworks for Advanced Applications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Opportunities of Covalent Organic Frameworks for Advanced Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/advs.201801410.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026