Hybrid Materials and Polymer Electrolytes for Electrochromic Device Applications
- Journal
- Advanced Materials
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/adma.201200213 →Countries where authors are citing Hybrid Materials and Polymer Electrolytes for Electrochromic Device Applications
This map shows the geographic impact of Hybrid Materials and Polymer Electrolytes for Electrochromic Device Applications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hybrid Materials and Polymer Electrolytes for Electrochromic Device Applications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hybrid Materials and Polymer Electrolytes for Electrochromic Device Applications more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Hybrid Materials and Polymer Electrolytes for Electrochromic Device Applications
This network shows the impact of Hybrid Materials and Polymer Electrolytes for Electrochromic Device Applications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Hybrid Materials and Polymer Electrolytes for Electrochromic Device Applications.
About Hybrid Materials and Polymer Electrolytes for Electrochromic Device Applications
This paper, published in 2012, received 713 indexed citations . Written by Vijay Kumar Thakur, Guoqiang Ding, Jan Ma, Pooi See Lee and Xuehong Lu covering the research area of Polymers and Plastics and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Polymers and Plastics (586 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (365 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (151 citations). Published in Advanced Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/adma.201200213.