Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X‐ray microtomography: A review
- Journal
- Water Resources Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/2014wr015256 →Countries where authors are citing Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X‐ray microtomography: A review
This map shows the geographic impact of Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X‐ray microtomography: A review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X‐ray microtomography: A review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X‐ray microtomography: A review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X‐ray microtomography: A review
This network shows the impact of Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X‐ray microtomography: A review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X‐ray microtomography: A review.
About Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X‐ray microtomography: A review
This paper, published in 2014, received 527 indexed citations . Written by Steffen Schlüter, Adrian Sheppard, K. Brown and D. Wildenschild covering the research area of Mechanics of Materials, Ocean Engineering and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ocean Engineering (285 citations), Mechanics of Materials (235 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (158 citations). Published in Water Resources Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/2014wr015256.