Greene's Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis

927 indexed citations
published 2006
Authors
Peter G. M. WutsTheodora W. Greene

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/0470053488 →

Countries where authors are citing Greene's Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Greene's Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greene's Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greene's Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Greene's Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Greene's Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Greene's Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis.

About Greene's Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis

This paper, published in 2006, received 927 indexed citations . Written by Peter G. M. Wuts and Theodora W. Greene covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (684 citations), Molecular Biology (339 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (126 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/0470053488.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Emerging infectious disease and the loss of biodiversity in a Neotropical amphibian communityBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Glutathione metabolism in cancer progression and treatment resistanceBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Epidemiologic Analysis with a Programmable CalculatorBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Learning from Labeled and Unlabeled Data with Label PropagationBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Carleton's Histological techniqueBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Atomically-thin two-dimensional sheets for understanding active sites in catalysisBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper SHP-1 and SHP-2 Associate with Immunoreceptor Tyrosine-Based Switch Motif of Programmed Death 1 upon Primary Human T Cell Stimulation, but Only Receptor Ligation Prevents T Cell ActivationBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy StudiesBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper The Cholinergic Hypothesis of Age and Alzheimer’s Disease-Related Cognitive Deficits: Recent Challenges and Their Implications for Novel Drug DevelopmentBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Definition of clinically relevant non‐major bleeding in studies of anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease in non‐surgical patients: communication from the SSC of the ISTH
Rankless by CCL
2026