Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation
20221.5k citationsZiwei Ji, Nayeon Lee et al.ACM Computing Surveysprofile →
A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity
2023388 citationsYejin Bang, Samuel Cahyawijaya et al.Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology)profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ziwei Ji's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ziwei Ji with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ziwei Ji more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ziwei Ji. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ziwei Ji. The network helps show where Ziwei Ji may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ziwei Ji
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ziwei Ji.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ziwei Ji based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ziwei Ji. Ziwei Ji is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ishii, Etsuko, Bryan Wilie, Ziwei Ji, et al.. (2023). Contrastive Learning for Inference in Dialogue. Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology). 10202–10221.1 indexed citations
Bang, Yejin, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Nayeon Lee, et al.. (2023). A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity. Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology). 675–718.388 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Ji, Ziwei, Nayeon Lee, Rita Frieske, et al.. (2022). Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation. ACM Computing Surveys. 55(12). 1–38.1469 indexed citations breakdown →
Ji, Ziwei & Matus Telgarsky. (2020). Polylogarithmic width suffices for gradient descent to achieve arbitrarily small test error with shallow ReLU networks. arXiv (Cornell University).10 indexed citations
16.
Ji, Ziwei & Matus Telgarsky. (2020). Directional convergence and alignment in deep learning. Neural Information Processing Systems. 33. 17176–17186.2 indexed citations
17.
Ji, Ziwei, et al.. (2020). Neural tangent kernels, transportation mappings, and universal approximation. arXiv (Cornell University).2 indexed citations
18.
Ji, Ziwei, Miroslav Dudı́k, Robert E. Schapire, & Matus Telgarsky. (2020). Gradient descent follows the regularization path for general losses.. Conference on Learning Theory. 2109–2136.
19.
Ji, Ziwei & Matus Telgarsky. (2019). The implicit bias of gradient descent on nonseparable data. Conference on Learning Theory. 1772–1798.14 indexed citations
20.
Ji, Ziwei & Matus Telgarsky. (2019). Gradient descent aligns the layers of deep linear networks. International Conference on Learning Representations.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.