Zarah Monfaredi

465 total citations
8 papers, 184 citations indexed

About

Zarah Monfaredi is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Zarah Monfaredi has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 184 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in General Health Professions, 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 2 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Zarah Monfaredi's work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers). Zarah Monfaredi is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers). Zarah Monfaredi collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Croatia and Austria. Zarah Monfaredi's co-authors include Dean Fergusson, Joshua Montroy, Chantelle Garritty, Beverley Shea, Mona Ghannad, Anne Lyddiatt, Lisa Duffett, Fatemeh Yazdi, Risa Shorr and Tamara Rader and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Canadian Medical Association Journal and EBioMedicine.

In The Last Decade

Zarah Monfaredi

8 papers receiving 182 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Zarah Monfaredi Canada 6 139 38 26 18 16 8 184
Louise Dudley United Kingdom 5 267 1.9× 76 2.0× 36 1.4× 41 2.3× 28 1.8× 8 327
Lidewij Eva Vat Netherlands 8 211 1.5× 51 1.3× 30 1.2× 38 2.1× 19 1.2× 12 268
Audrey L’Espérance Canada 5 184 1.3× 34 0.9× 19 0.7× 15 0.8× 7 0.4× 14 218
Regina Greer-Smith United States 5 92 0.7× 44 1.2× 9 0.3× 28 1.6× 3 0.2× 8 166
Cathy Rice United Kingdom 8 122 0.9× 32 0.8× 13 0.5× 15 0.8× 7 0.4× 12 233
Sarah Combes United Kingdom 7 97 0.7× 114 3.0× 12 0.5× 24 1.3× 8 0.5× 13 192
Teija Hammar Finland 8 121 0.9× 22 0.6× 20 0.8× 37 2.1× 4 0.3× 18 179
Leah Z. Rand United States 8 110 0.8× 45 1.2× 13 0.5× 72 4.0× 7 0.4× 22 214
Dick Rogers United States 13 94 0.7× 31 0.8× 15 0.6× 14 0.8× 3 0.2× 33 364
Leslie R. Boone United States 6 158 1.1× 108 2.8× 17 0.7× 25 1.4× 3 0.2× 8 253

Countries citing papers authored by Zarah Monfaredi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zarah Monfaredi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zarah Monfaredi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zarah Monfaredi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zarah Monfaredi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zarah Monfaredi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zarah Monfaredi. The network helps show where Zarah Monfaredi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Zarah Monfaredi

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Zarah Monfaredi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Zarah Monfaredi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Zarah Monfaredi. Zarah Monfaredi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Nicholls, Stuart G., Zarah Monfaredi, Chantelle Garritty, et al.. (2022). The impact of patient engagement on trials and trialists in Ontario, Canada: An interview study with IMPACT awardees. Research Involvement and Engagement. 8(1). 50–50. 3 indexed citations
2.
Fergusson, Dean, Zeinab Daham, Madison Foster, et al.. (2021). Patient engagement in preclinical laboratory research: A scoping review. EBioMedicine. 70. 103484–103484. 32 indexed citations
3.
Cobey, Kelly D., et al.. (2021). Editors-in-chief perceptions of patients as (co) authors on publications and the acceptability of ICMJE authorship criteria: a cross-sectional survey. Research Involvement and Engagement. 7(1). 39–39. 16 indexed citations
4.
Foster, Madison, Dean Fergusson, Justin Presseau, et al.. (2020). Partnering with patients to get better outcomes with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: towards engagement of patients in early phase trials. Research Involvement and Engagement. 6(1). 61–61. 12 indexed citations
5.
Garritty, Chantelle, Candyce Hamel, Mona Hersi, et al.. (2020). Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policy-makers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study. Health Research Policy and Systems. 18(1). 112–112. 11 indexed citations
6.
Garritty, Chantelle, Mona Hersi, Candyce Hamel, et al.. (2020). Assessing the format and content of journal published and non-journal published rapid review reports: A comparative study. PLoS ONE. 15(8). e0238025–e0238025. 4 indexed citations
7.
Fergusson, Dean, Zarah Monfaredi, Kusala Pussegoda, et al.. (2018). The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials: a systematic review. Research Involvement and Engagement. 4(1). 17–17. 101 indexed citations
8.
Fergusson, Dean & Zarah Monfaredi. (2018). Demonstrating the value of patient-oriented research in Ontario. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 190(Suppl). S53–S54. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026