Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Addressing the Digital Divide: Access and Use of Technology in Education
This map shows the geographic impact of Zahoor Ahmad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zahoor Ahmad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zahoor Ahmad more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zahoor Ahmad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zahoor Ahmad. The network helps show where Zahoor Ahmad may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Zahoor Ahmad
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Zahoor Ahmad.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Zahoor Ahmad based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Zahoor Ahmad. Zahoor Ahmad is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Iqbal, Muhammad Aamir, et al.. (2015). A preliminary study on plant nutrients production as combined fertilizers, consumption patterns and future prospects for Pakistan.. American-Asian-Journal of agricultural & environmental sciences. 15(4). 588–594.6 indexed citations
Shafee, Muhammad, et al.. (2012). Isolation and biochemical characterization of Rhizobium meliloti from root nodules of Alfalfa (Medico sativa).. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 22(2). 522–524.22 indexed citations
12.
Ahmad, Zahoor, et al.. (2012). CAN COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY BE USED TO TRIAGE PATIENTS WITH CHEST PAIN PRESENTING TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT. Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute. 26(3).1 indexed citations
13.
Haq, Aminul, et al.. (2010). ASSOCIATION OF SERUM URIC ACID WITH BLOOD UREA AND SERUM CREATININE. 6(2). 46–49.14 indexed citations
14.
Abbasi, Nadeem Akhtar, et al.. (2009). Molecular characterization and genetic relationship among loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) genotypes of Pakistan assessed by RAPD markers.. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 41(5). 2437–2444.2 indexed citations
Ghafoor, Abdul & Zahoor Ahmad. (2005). Diversity of agronomic traits and total seed protein in black gram Vigna mungo [L.] Hepper. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia s Botanica. 47(2).19 indexed citations
17.
Ahmad, Zahoor, et al.. (2005). Correlation studies on micro-nutrient cations with soil properties of apple orchard of Kashmir. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 62(4). 391–393.1 indexed citations
18.
Ghaffar, Abdul, et al.. (2000). Pupation and diapausing behaviour of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in the Punjab.. Pakistan Journal of Zoology. 32(1). 61–64.1 indexed citations
19.
Ghafoor, Abdul, Zahoor Ahmad, A. S. Qureshi, & S. M. Iqbal. (2000). Significance of mungbean yellow mosaic virus on yield and its components in Vigna mungo L. Hepper.. Pakistan Journal of Phytopathology. 12(2). 74–78.1 indexed citations
20.
Ahmad, Zahoor, et al.. (1992). Genetic variability and correlation studies in rice bean.. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research. 13(2). 121–125.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.