Z. W.

3.1k citations
51 papers · 2.4k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Z. W.

51 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

Geospace Environmental Modeling (GEM) Magnetic Reconnection Challenge 2001 · 928 citations
9282001202620092017250500750

Peers

Z. W.
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.1k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 963
  • Geophysics 340
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 590
  • Molecular Biology 395
Replace Amita Das with:
Amita Das India
J. Egedal United States
Patrick Pribyl United States
Chang‐Mo Ryu South Korea
S. Okamura Japan
G. Fiksel United States
B. P. Pandey Australia
C. N. Lashmore‐Davies United Kingdom
K. Avinash India
H. Hayakawa Japan
Z. W. relative to Amita Das India Amita Das's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Amita Das · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Z. W.

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Z. W.'s research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Z. W. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Z. W. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Z. W.

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Z. W.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Z. W.. The network helps show where Z. W. may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Z. W., linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Z. W. Line = papers co-authored together Z. W. links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Geospace Environmental Modeling (GEM) Magnetic Reconnection Challenge
Hit paper breakdown →
2001928
2 1999197
3 2000133
4 2018104
5 2006102
6 200188
7 200287
8 201559
9 200459
10 200753
11 200353
12 201739
13 199132
14 199530
15 199828
16 201927
17 200727
18 199626
19 201625
20 200425

About Z. W.

Z. W. is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics and Geophysics, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (47 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (34 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (29 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (10 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (5 papers), Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena (5 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (4 papers) and Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.1k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (963 citations), Geophysics (340 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (590 citations) and Molecular Biology (395 citations). Z. W. has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include A. Bhattacharjee, J. Goree, M. A. Shay, J. Birn, R. E. Denton, J. F. Drake, M. M. Kuznetsova, B. N. Rogers, M. Hesse and A. Otto. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Geophysical Research Letters and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026