Y.-L. Chow

833 total citations
9 papers, 192 citations indexed

About

Y.-L. Chow is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, Y.-L. Chow has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 192 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 5 papers in Signal Processing and 1 paper in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in Y.-L. Chow's work include Speech Recognition and Synthesis (9 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (5 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (4 papers). Y.-L. Chow is often cited by papers focused on Speech Recognition and Synthesis (9 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (5 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (4 papers). Y.-L. Chow collaborates with scholars based in United States. Y.-L. Chow's co-authors include Richard Schwartz, S. Roucos, J. Makhoul, M. Krasner, Owen Kimball, P. Price, Ján Rohlíček, H. Gish, M. Dunham and Francis Kubala and has published in prestigious journals such as International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

In The Last Decade

Y.-L. Chow

9 papers receiving 150 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Y.-L. Chow United States	6	161	102	44	17	6	9	192
Sebastian Stüker Germany	8	235 1.5×	49 0.5×	57 1.3×	6 0.4×	3 0.5×	16	248
Carlton Downey New Zealand	6	201 1.2×	136 1.3×	19 0.4×	10 0.6×	2 0.3×	13	217
Andras Rozsa United States	5	84 0.5×	53 0.5×	88 2.0×	8 0.5×	6 1.0×	6	131
Ilya Oparin France	8	263 1.6×	51 0.5×	56 1.3×	4 0.2×	12 2.0×	14	302
Jason Riesa United States	9	231 1.4×	29 0.3×	44 1.0×	7 0.4×	11 1.8×	14	250
Adrià Giménez Spain	11	209 1.3×	63 0.6×	102 2.3×	5 0.3×	8 1.3×	23	272
Mattia Antonino Di Gangi Italy	10	358 2.2×	40 0.4×	52 1.2×	24 1.4×	4 0.7×	14	401
Ahmad Emami United States	11	301 1.9×	74 0.7×	16 0.4×	4 0.2×	5 0.8×	18	311
Matthias Paulik United States	11	335 2.1×	38 0.4×	51 1.2×	4 0.2×	7 1.2×	30	348
E. W. D. Whittaker Japan	10	284 1.8×	87 0.9×	27 0.6×	5 0.3×	8 1.3×	19	293

Countries citing papers authored by Y.-L. Chow

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Y.-L. Chow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Y.-L. Chow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Y.-L. Chow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Y.-L. Chow

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Y.-L. Chow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Y.-L. Chow. The network helps show where Y.-L. Chow may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Y.-L. Chow

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Y.-L. Chow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Y.-L. Chow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Y.-L. Chow. Y.-L. Chow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Schwartz, Richard, Y.-L. Chow, S. Roucos, M. Krasner, & J. Makhoul. (2005). Improved hidden Markov modeling of phonemes for continuous speech recognition. 9. 21–24. 24 indexed citations

2.

Chow, Y.-L., M. Dunham, Owen Kimball, et al.. (2005). BYBLOS: The BBN continuous speech recognition system. 12. 89–92. 15 indexed citations

3.

Schwartz, Richard, Y.-L. Chow, Owen Kimball, et al.. (2005). Context-dependent modeling for acoustic-phonetic recognition of continuous speech. 10. 1205–1208. 28 indexed citations

4.

Chow, Y.-L., et al.. (2003). Speech understanding using a unification grammar. International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. 727–730. 2 indexed citations

5.

Schwartz, Richard, Owen Kimball, Francis Kubala, et al.. (2003). Robust smoothing methods for discrete hidden Markov models. International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. 548–551. 1 indexed citations

6.

Kubala, Francis, Y.-L. Chow, Owen Kimball, et al.. (2003). Continuous speech recognition results of the BYBLOS system on the DARPA 1000-word resource management database. 291–294. 6 indexed citations

7.

Schwartz, Richard & Y.-L. Chow. (2002). The N-best algorithms: an efficient and exact procedure for finding the N most likely sentence hypotheses. International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. 81–84. 86 indexed citations

8.

Chow, Y.-L.. (2002). Maximum mutual information estimation of HMM parameters for continuous speech recognition using the N-best algorithm. International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. ?ii. 701–704. 25 indexed citations

9.

Gish, H., Y.-L. Chow, & Ján Rohlíček. (2002). Probabilistic vector mapping of noisy speech parameters for HMM word spotting. International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. 117–120. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact