Countries citing papers authored by Yannick Versley
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Yannick Versley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yannick Versley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yannick Versley more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yannick Versley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yannick Versley. The network helps show where Yannick Versley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Yannick Versley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Yannick Versley.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Yannick Versley based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Yannick Versley. Yannick Versley is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Versley, Yannick. (2013). A graph-based approach for implicit discourse relations. 3. 148–173.2 indexed citations
6.
Versley, Yannick. (2013). SFS-TUE: Compound Paraphrasing with a Language Model and Discriminative Reranking. Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics. 2. 148–152.4 indexed citations
7.
Versley, Yannick. (2013). Subgraph-based Classification of Explicit and Implicit Discourse Relations. 264–275.7 indexed citations
Delogu, Francesca, et al.. (2010). Anaphoric Annotation of Wikipedia and Blogs in the Live Memories Corpus. Language Resources and Evaluation.23 indexed citations
10.
Tsarfaty, Reut, Yoav Goldberg, Sandra Kuebler, et al.. (2010). Statistical Parsing of Morphologically Rich Languages (SPMRL) What, How and Whither. Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology). 1–12.67 indexed citations
11.
Broscheit, Samuel, Simone Paolo Ponzetto, Yannick Versley, & Massimo Poesio. (2010). Extending BART to provide a coreference resolution system for German. Language Resources and Evaluation.8 indexed citations
12.
Broscheit, Samuel, Massimo Poesio, Simone Paolo Ponzetto, et al.. (2010). BART: A Multilingual Anaphora Resolution System. MADOC (University of Mannheim). 104–107.26 indexed citations
13.
Recasens, Marta Vilar, Lluı́s Màrquez, M. Antònia Martí, et al.. (2010). SemEval-2010 Task 1: Coreference Resolution in Multiple Languages. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 1–8.104 indexed citations
14.
Poesio, Massimo, Olga Uryupina, & Yannick Versley. (2010). Creating a Coreference Resolution System for Italian. Language Resources and Evaluation.10 indexed citations
15.
Versley, Yannick, et al.. (2010). A Syntax-first Approach to High-quality Morphological Analysis and Lemma Disambiguation for the TüBa-D/Z Treebank. DSpace repository (University of Tartu).3 indexed citations
Kübler, Sandra, Wolfgang Maier, Ines Rehbein, & Yannick Versley. (2008). How to Compare Treebanks. Language Resources and Evaluation.9 indexed citations
18.
Versley, Yannick, Simone Paolo Ponzetto, Massimo Poesio, et al.. (2008). BART: A modular toolkit for coreference resolution. Language Resources and Evaluation.88 indexed citations
19.
Versley, Yannick, Simone Paolo Ponzetto, Massimo Poesio, et al.. (2008). BART. 9–12.30 indexed citations
20.
Versley, Yannick. (2007). Antecedent Selection Techniques for High-Recall Coreference Resolution. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 496–505.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.