Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The climatology of planetary boundary layer height in China derived fromradiosonde and reanalysis data
2016446 citationsJianping Guo, Yucong Miao et al.Atmospheric chemistry and physicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Yan Yan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yan Yan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yan Yan more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yan Yan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yan Yan. The network helps show where Yan Yan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Yan Yan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Yan Yan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Yan Yan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Yan Yan. Yan Yan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Zhao, Xing, et al.. (2018). [Temporal and spatial distribution of air pollution in Shenzhen City during 2014-2016].. PubMed. 47(2). 270–276.3 indexed citations
11.
Fan, Jingjie, et al.. (2018). [Analysis on the pollution characteristics and influence factors of PM_(2. 5) in Shenzhen City in 2016].. PubMed. 47(3). 406–412.1 indexed citations
12.
Guo, Jianping, Yucong Miao, Yong Zhang, et al.. (2016). The climatology of planetary boundary layer height in China derived fromradiosonde and reanalysis data. Atmospheric chemistry and physics. 16(20). 13309–13319.446 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Yan, Yan, Wenbin, Xie, et al.. (2016). Distribution and assessment of heavy metals in the surface sediment of Yellow River, China. 环境科学学报：英文版. 45–51.2 indexed citations
14.
Jiang, Zhang, Tian Tian, et al.. (2015). Mid-Pliocene Westerlies from PlioMIP Simulations. 大气科学进展：英文版. 32(7). 909–923.1 indexed citations
15.
Zhao, Chen, Cheng, et al.. (2013). Monitoring the Amery Ice Shelf front during 2004-2012 using ENVISAT ASAR data. 24(2). 133–137.7 indexed citations
16.
Yan, Yan. (2012). Remote Sensing Image Recognition Algorithm Based on Neural Network. Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology.1 indexed citations
17.
Yan, Yan. (2009). Organization,Administration and Illumination of Rural Sewage Treatment in USA and Japan. China Water & Wastewater.1 indexed citations
Yan, Yan, et al.. (2008). Analysis of the relationship between urbanisation and energy consumption in China. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 15(4).10 indexed citations
20.
Wang, et al.. (2002). Determination of cloud-top height from stereoscopic observation. 自然科学进展：英文版. 689–694.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.