Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
An ultraluminous quasar with a twelve-billion-solar-mass black hole at redshift 6.30
2015445 citationsXue-Bing Wu, Feige Wang et al.Natureprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Y. Beletsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Y. Beletsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Y. Beletsky more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Y. Beletsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Y. Beletsky. The network helps show where Y. Beletsky may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Y. Beletsky
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Y. Beletsky.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Y. Beletsky based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Y. Beletsky. Y. Beletsky is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Olivares, J., H. Bouy, L. M. Sarro, et al.. (2019). Ruprecht 147 DANCe. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 625. A115–A115.26 indexed citations
5.
Miret-Roig, N., H. Bouy, J. Olivares, et al.. (2019). IC 4665 DANCe. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 631. A57–A57.9 indexed citations
6.
Boffin, H. M. J., David Jones, R. Wesson, et al.. (2018). When nature tries to trick us An eclipsing eccentric close binary superposed on the central star of the planetary nebula M 3-2. UCL Discovery (University College London).5 indexed citations
7.
Boffin, H. M. J., David Jones, R. Wesson, et al.. (2018). When nature tries to trick us. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 619. A84–A84.9 indexed citations
8.
Krełowski, J., Г. А. Галазутдинов, G. Mulas, et al.. (2016). Variable Intensities of Molecular Features in the Spectrum of AE Aur. 66(3). 391–403.2 indexed citations
Wu, Xue-Bing, Feige Wang, Xiaohui Fan, et al.. (2015). An ultraluminous quasar with a twelve-billion-solar-mass black hole at redshift 6.30. Nature. 518(7540). 512–515.445 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Bouy, H., E. Bertin, D. Barrado, et al.. (2015). Messier 35 (NGC 2168) DANCe. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 575. A120–A120.9 indexed citations
Boffin, H. M. J., David Jones, Y. Beletsky, et al.. (2012). POPIPlaN: A Deep Morphological Catalogue of Newly Discovered Southern Planetary Nebulae. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 148. 25–27.3 indexed citations
18.
Salama, Farid, Г. А. Галазутдинов, J. Krełowski, et al.. (2011). PAHs in Translucent Interstellar Clouds. 218.1 indexed citations
19.
Grosbøl, P., G. Carraro, & Y. Beletsky. (2011). Report on the ESO Workshop ''Spiral Structure in the Milky Way: Confronting Observations and Theory''. The Messenger. 143. 47–48.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.