Xiaoting Huang

109 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Xiaoting Huang
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • Biochemistry 163
  • Cancer Research 244
  • Building and Construction 149
  • Molecular Biology 694
  • Biomedical Engineering 430
Replace Shufen Li with:
Shufen Li China
Kun Hu China
Suzhen Li China
Ruijing Zhang China
Jin-Hui Wang China
Qiuhua Zhang China
Hong Lin Zhao China
Ting Zhang China
Xiaolin Bi China
Shuyan Wu China
Xiaoting Huang relative to Shufen Li China Shufen Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Shufen Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaoting Huang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaoting Huang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaoting Huang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaoting Huang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaoting Huang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaoting Huang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaoting Huang. The network helps show where Xiaoting Huang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiaoting Huang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaoting Huang Line = papers co-authored together Xiaoting Huang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 114 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018208
2 2018190
3 2017122
4 2019118
5 2019108
6 202286
7 201583
8 201777
9 201672
10 202168
11 202268
12 201564
13 201856
14 201950
15 201646
16 202046
17 202046
18 202146
19 202345
20 202142

About Xiaoting Huang

Xiaoting Huang is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Cancer Research, Building and Construction, Biomedical Engineering and Automotive Engineering, having authored 114 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (7 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (6 papers), Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (6 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (6 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (5 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (4 papers), Traffic control and management (4 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (163 citations), Cancer Research (244 citations), Building and Construction (149 citations), Molecular Biology (694 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (430 citations). Xiaoting Huang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Ying Ching Tan, Zhiqiang Xu, Jun Yin, Sheng‐Hua Liu, Nanwen Zhu, Haiping Yuan, Rui Dong, Liping Du, Shuying Xu and Yang Liu. Their work appears in journals such as RSC Advances, Frontiers in Oncology, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) and Chemical Engineering Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact