Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
UNet 3+: A Full-Scale Connected UNet for Medical Image Segmentation
20201.6k citationsLanfen Lin, Ruofeng Tong et al.profile →
Mixed Transformer U-Net for Medical Image Segmentation
2022213 citationsLanfen Lin, Yutaro Iwamoto et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Xian‐Hua Han's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xian‐Hua Han with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xian‐Hua Han more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xian‐Hua Han. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xian‐Hua Han. The network helps show where Xian‐Hua Han may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Xian‐Hua Han
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Xian‐Hua Han.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Xian‐Hua Han based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Xian‐Hua Han. Xian‐Hua Han is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Han, Xian‐Hua, et al.. (2016). A preliminary study on tensor codebook model for multiphase medical image retrieval (ヘルスケア・医療情報通信技術). IEICE technical report. Speech. 116(224). 47–50.1 indexed citations
12.
Chen, Yen‐Wei, Jie Luo, Tomoko Tateyama, et al.. (2012). Statistical shape model of the liver and effective mode selection for classification of liver cirrhosis. 449–452.1 indexed citations
13.
Han, Xian‐Hua, et al.. (2012). Example-Based Super-Resolution using Locally Linear Embedding. 861–865.3 indexed citations
14.
Tateyama, Tomoko, Xian‐Hua Han, Shuzo Kanasaki, et al.. (2012). Shape representation of human anatomy using spherical harmonic basis function. 866–869.1 indexed citations
15.
Han, Xian‐Hua, et al.. (2012). Auto-recognition of food images using SPIN feature for Food-Log system. 874–877.12 indexed citations
16.
Tateyama, Tomoko, Amir Hossein Foruzan, Xian‐Hua Han, et al.. (2012). 3D visualization of liver and its vascular structures and surgical planning system — Surgical simulation. 939–944.
17.
Xu, Qiao, Xuantao Su, Xian‐Hua Han, & Yen‐Wei Chen. (2012). A new linear coding algorithm for efficient multi-dimensional data representation without data expansion. 478–482.1 indexed citations
18.
Han, Xian‐Hua, Yen‐Wei Chen, & Xiang Ruan. (2011). Multi-class Co-training learning for object and scene Recognition. Machine Vision and Applications. 67–70.1 indexed citations
19.
Okamoto, A., et al.. (2010). Hierarchical Classifier with Multiple Feature Weighted Fusion for Scene Recognition. International Conference on Software Engineering. 110(27). 175–179.1 indexed citations
20.
Han, Xian‐Hua, et al.. (2008). Noise Reduction and Signal Enhancement in IVR Images by ICA Shrinkage Filters and Multiscale Filters. ITC-CSCC :International Technical Conference on Circuits Systems, Computers and Communications. 769–772.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.