Wu is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Artificial Intelligence and Management of Technology and Innovation.
According to data from OpenAlex, Wu has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 631 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Strategy and Management, 4 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 3 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation. Recurrent topics in Wu's work include Business Strategy and Innovation (2 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (2 papers) and Digital Platforms and Economics (2 papers). Wu is often cited by papers focused on Business Strategy and Innovation (2 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (2 papers) and Digital Platforms and Economics (2 papers). Wu collaborates with scholars based in United States. Wu's co-authors include Huang, Fang, Xi, Dan Dan, Zhihua, Li, Cheng Cheng, Dong, Li and Rong Rong and has published in prestigious journals such as MIS Quarterly, e-Service Journal and 矿业科学技术：英文版.
In The Last Decade
Wu
25 papers
receiving
596 citations
Hit Papers
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Cocreation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Enterprise Software1
This map shows the geographic impact of Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wu more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wu. The network helps show where Wu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wu.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wu based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Wu. Wu is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wei, Wei, Li, Wenjun, et al.. (2017). Crowd intelligence in AI 2.0 era. 18(1). 15–43.18 indexed citations
2.
Yu, et al.. (2014). Research on Evaluation System of Coordinated Development between Regional Sports and Economy Based on TOPSIS Method. 65–66.1 indexed citations
3.
Wu, et al.. (2014). Network View and Cognitive Mechanism for Virtual Network Resource Management Based Intelligent. 电子学报：英文版. 23(3). 574–578.2 indexed citations
4.
Lei, Lei, Wu, Shuang, et al.. (2013). Clustering PPI Data Based on Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm. 电子学报：英文版. 22(1). 118–123.1 indexed citations
5.
Wang, Kai Kai, Jiang Jiang, et al.. (2012). Destruction mechanism of gas explosion to ventilation facilities and automatic recovery technology. 矿业科学技术学报：英文版. 22(3). 417–422.5 indexed citations
6.
Dong, et al.. (2012). How would Capital Account Liberalization Affect China＇s Capital Flows and the Renminbi Real Exchange Rates？. 中国与世界经济：英文版. 20(6). 29–54.4 indexed citations
7.
Wu & Hongying. (2011). On the BRICs Cooperation Mechanism. 21(1). 73–85.
8.
Wu, Jiang, Weimin, et al.. (2011). Major accident analysis and prevention of coal mines in China from the year of 1949 to 2009. 矿业科学技术：英文版. 21(5). 693–699.4 indexed citations
9.
Huang, et al.. (2011). A breakthrough product R&D model by using the integration of four-phases QFDs and TRIZ. International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control. 185–190.
10.
Wu, et al.. (2010). CLUSTERING PATENTS USING NON-EXHAUSTIVE OVERLAPS. 162–181.2 indexed citations
11.
Weiguo, Jiang, Lei Lei, et al.. (2009). Risk assessment and validation of flood disaster based on fuzzy mathematics. 自然科学进展：英文版. 1419–1425.1 indexed citations
12.
Shen, et al.. (2009). Impact of Foreign Bank Entry on the Performance of Chinese Banks. 中国与世界经济：英文版. 102–123.2 indexed citations
13.
Hong, et al.. (2009). Clustering analysis of telecommunication customers. 中国邮电高校学报：英文版. 114–116.4 indexed citations
14.
Wu, et al.. (2009). A study of network-based multimedia college English autonomous teaching and learning model. 美中外语. 7(7). 38–55.4 indexed citations
15.
Wu, et al.. (2008). Would China＇s Sovereign Wealth Fund Be a Menace to the USA？. 中国与世界经济：英文版. 33–47.4 indexed citations
16.
Zhou, Zhou, et al.. (2008). Coordination game model of co-opetition relationship on cluster supply chains. 系统工程与电子技术：英文版. 19(3). 499–506.6 indexed citations
17.
Wu, et al.. (2007). ON CHARACTERIZATIONS OF D-η-PROPERLY PREQUASI-INVEX FUNCTION. 系统科学与复杂性：英文版. 20(4). 614–622.1 indexed citations
18.
Wu & Fang. (2006). The dynamic IT capabilities and firm agility: A resource-based perspective. 666–671.10 indexed citations
19.
Wu, et al.. (2006). Study on risk analysis of supply chain enterprises. 系统工程与电子技术：英文版. 17(4). 781–787.2 indexed citations
20.
Ling, et al.. (2004). On Outsourcing Internal Auditing. 3(6). 41–47.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.