Wouter G. van Inzen

410 total citations
10 papers, 293 citations indexed

About

Wouter G. van Inzen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Wouter G. van Inzen has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 293 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 4 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Wouter G. van Inzen's work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (5 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (3 papers). Wouter G. van Inzen is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Biology and Fertility (5 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (3 papers). Wouter G. van Inzen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Czechia and Germany. Wouter G. van Inzen's co-authors include Eric A.P. Steegers, Joop S.E. Laven, Fatima Hammiche, Régine P.M. Steegers‐Theunissen, John M. Twigt, Jacques C. Giltay, Sjerp M. Weima, P. Pearson, Leon G.J. Tertoolen and Maikel P. Peppelenbosch and has published in prestigious journals such as Human Reproduction, Fertility and Sterility and Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research.

In The Last Decade

Wouter G. van Inzen

10 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Wouter G. van Inzen

RM

PHEOH

PPCH

MB

GENET

F Causio Italy

Caroline Pirkevi Çetinkaya Türkiye

Alison C. Peck United Kingdom

L Larue France

Victoria Ibéchéole Switzerland

Lynette Wilson United Kingdom

Nicole Joyé France

Jennifer Eccles United States

Thelma M. Macaso United States

J. Egozcue Spain

F Causio Italy

Wouter G. van Inzen

106 ×0.8

RM

87 ×0.7

PHEOH

103 ×0.9

PPCH

70 ×0.8

MB

78 ×0.9

GENET

Citations per year, relative to Wouter G. van Inzen Wouter G. van Inzen (= 1×) peers F Causio

Countries citing papers authored by Wouter G. van Inzen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wouter G. van Inzen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wouter G. van Inzen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wouter G. van Inzen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wouter G. van Inzen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wouter G. van Inzen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wouter G. van Inzen. The network helps show where Wouter G. van Inzen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wouter G. van Inzen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wouter G. van Inzen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wouter G. van Inzen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wouter G. van Inzen. Wouter G. van Inzen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Twigt, John M., Eric A.P. Steegers, Fatima Hammiche, et al.. (2012). The preconception diet is associated with the chance of ongoing pregnancy in women undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment. Human Reproduction. 27(8). 2526–2531. 106 indexed citations

2.

Aktaş, Mustafa Sinan, Nicole G.M. Beckers, Wouter G. van Inzen, Arie Verhoeff, & Diederick De Jong. (2005). Oocytes in the empty follicle: a controversial syndrome. Fertility and Sterility. 84(6). 1643–1648. 34 indexed citations

3.

Giltay, Jacques C., et al.. (1999). Sperm analysis in a subfertile male with a Y;16 translocation, using four-color FISH. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 84(1-2). 67–72. 45 indexed citations

4.

Giltay, Jacques C., et al.. (1998). Case report: One normal child and a chromosomally balanced/normal twin after intracytoplasmic sperm injection in a male with a de-novo t(Y;16) translocation. Human Reproduction. 13(10). 2745–2747. 11 indexed citations

5.

Inzen, Wouter G. van, et al.. (1996). Neuronal differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research. 1312(1). 21–26. 23 indexed citations

6.

Inzen, Wouter G. van, et al.. (1996). The role of receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase α in neuronal differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Developmental Brain Research. 91(2). 304–307. 18 indexed citations

7.

Inzen, Wouter G. van, et al.. (1995). Culture of bovine embryos to the blastocyst stage using Buffalo rat liver (BRL) cells. Theriogenology. 43(4). 723–738. 17 indexed citations

8.

Inzen, Wouter G. van, et al.. (1994). Stage‐specific appearance of the mouse antigen TEC‐3 in normal and nuclear transfer bovine embryos: Re‐expression after nuclear transfer. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 37(1). 27–33. 28 indexed citations

9.

Inzen, Wouter G. van, et al.. (1993). Nuclear transfer and electrofusion in bovine in vitro‐matured/in vitro‐fertilized embryos: Effect of media and electrical fusion parameters. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 36(3). 307–312. 9 indexed citations

10.

Inzen, Wouter G. van, Th.A.M. Kruip, & Sjerp M. Weima. (1993). Use of conditioned medium for IVM-IVF bovine embryos in-vitro culture systems. Theriogenology. 39(1). 236–236. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact