Wout Slob
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 0.2%
- Cancer Research top 1%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Pollution top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Tom AldenbergMoniek N. PietersAldert H. PiersmaBas BokkersHilko van der VoetR. Woodrow SetzerLeo T.M. van der VenLya G. Soeteman‐Hernández
- Topics
- Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (55 papers)Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (48 papers)Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (30 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Wout Slob
138 papers receiving 5.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 174
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 2.9k
- Cancer Research 1.5k
- Plant Science 753
- Pollution 695
- Molecular Biology 645
Countries citing papers authored by Wout Slob
This map shows the geographic impact of Wout Slob's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wout Slob with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wout Slob more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wout Slob
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wout Slob. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wout Slob. The network helps show where Wout Slob may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wout Slob
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wout Slob. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wout Slob based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wout Slob. Wout Slob is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 57 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 40 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | Special Issue: Application of the Margin of Exposure (MoE) Approach to Substances in Food that are Genotoxic and Carcinogenic. | 11 |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | 46 | |
| 16 | 73 | |
| 17 | 49 | |
| 18 | 82 | |
| 19 | 52 | |
| 20 | 54 |
About Wout Slob
Wout Slob is a scholar working on Chemical Health and Safety, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Cancer Research, having authored 140 papers that have together received 5.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (55 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (48 papers) and Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (30 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (2.9k citations), Chemical Health and Safety (136 citations) and Cancer Research (1.5k citations). Wout Slob has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tom Aldenberg, Moniek N. Pieters, Aldert H. Piersma, Bas Bokkers, Hilko van der Voet, R. Woodrow Setzer, Leo T.M. van der Ven, Lya G. Soeteman‐Hernández, George E. Johnson and Betty C. Hakkert. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hazardous Materials, Brain Research and Environmental Health Perspectives.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.