Wolf‐Georg Forssmann
- Molecular Biology top 1%
- Microbiology top 0.1%
- Immunology top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 1%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 2%
- Co-authors
- Knut AdermannHans‐Jürgen MägertLudger StändkerManfred RaidaM. ReineckePeter Schulz‐KnappeEberhard WeiheHarald John
- Topics
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (39 papers)Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (25 papers)Heart Failure Treatment and Management (23 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Wolf‐Georg Forssmann
258 papers receiving 9.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Molecular Biology 4.5k
- Microbiology 1.9k
- Immunology 1.6k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.5k
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Wolf‐Georg Forssmann
This map shows the geographic impact of Wolf‐Georg Forssmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolf‐Georg Forssmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolf‐Georg Forssmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wolf‐Georg Forssmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolf‐Georg Forssmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolf‐Georg Forssmann. The network helps show where Wolf‐Georg Forssmann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wolf‐Georg Forssmann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wolf‐Georg Forssmann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wolf‐Georg Forssmann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wolf‐Georg Forssmann. Wolf‐Georg Forssmann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 93 | |
| 7 | 36 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 77 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 170 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 45 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 67 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 35 |
About Wolf‐Georg Forssmann
Wolf‐Georg Forssmann is a scholar working on Microbiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 259 papers that have together received 10.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (39 papers), Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (25 papers) and Heart Failure Treatment and Management (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (1.9k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.5k citations) and Immunology (1.6k citations). Wolf‐Georg Forssmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Knut Adermann, Hans‐Jürgen Mägert, Ludger Ständker, Manfred Raida, M. Reinecke, Peter Schulz‐Knappe, Eberhard Weihe, Harald John, Ulf Forssmann and Enno Klüver. Their work appears in journals such as Cell, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.